Seattle U.
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
720  Lila Rice JR 21:14
943  Olivia Stein FR 21:30
944  Elena Smith SR 21:31
1,198  Moira O'Connor Lenth JR 21:49
1,570  Johanna Erickson SO 22:14
1,581  Lindsay Frederick SR 22:15
2,176  Taylor de Laveaga SR 22:56
National Rank #180 of 339
West Region Rank #27 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 13.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lila Rice Olivia Stein Elena Smith Moira O'Connor Lenth Johanna Erickson Lindsay Frederick Taylor de Laveaga
Washington Invitational 10/02 1201 21:03 21:43 21:33 21:39 22:21 22:38 22:02
Emerald City Open 10/17 1203 20:59 21:38 21:41 21:53 23:00 22:18
Western Athletic Conference Championships 10/31 1228 21:43 21:27 21:28 22:04 22:21 22:49 23:27
West Region Championships 11/13 1199 21:17 21:19 21:27 21:47 22:00 21:48 23:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.1 687 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 2.4 4.0 5.7 7.5 8.9 10.1 12.0 13.2 13.0 9.8 6.7 3.4 1.4 0.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lila Rice 100.1
Olivia Stein 124.8
Elena Smith 125.2
Moira O'Connor Lenth 153.4
Johanna Erickson 190.1
Lindsay Frederick 191.6
Taylor de Laveaga 236.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 0.7% 0.7 17
18 2.4% 2.4 18
19 4.0% 4.0 19
20 5.7% 5.7 20
21 7.5% 7.5 21
22 8.9% 8.9 22
23 10.1% 10.1 23
24 12.0% 12.0 24
25 13.2% 13.2 25
26 13.0% 13.0 26
27 9.8% 9.8 27
28 6.7% 6.7 28
29 3.4% 3.4 29
30 1.4% 1.4 30
31 0.5% 0.5 31
32 0.2% 0.2 32
33 0.0% 0.0 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0